Acts 7:39

to whom our fathers wouldn’t be obedient, but rejected him, and turned back in their hearts to Egypt,

World English Bible
Learn

Your notes

Private to you. Anything you write on this verse, here or while reading, shows up here and in My study.

Other translations

WEBBE

to whom our fathers wouldn’t be obedient, but rejected him and turned back in their hearts to Egypt,

BSB

But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

KJV

To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt,

ASV

to whom our fathers would not be obedient, but thrust him from them, and turned back in their hearts unto Egypt,

BBE

By whom our fathers would not be controlled; but they put him on one side, turning back in their hearts to Egypt,

Original Greek

Look up a word

Tap a word to see what it means and everywhere else it's used.

The early church

But they did not hear him, keeping their disobedience, even after the miracles: "To whom," he says, "our fathers would not obey:" after the wonders done in those forty years. And not only so, but just the contrary: "but thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back again into Egypt."
John Chrysostom · d. 407Homilies on Acts
Then follows the charge, in the first instance, against the patriarchs [after], the "signs and wonders," after the receiving of the "lively oracles: To whom," he says, "our fathers would not obey." But concerning those, Ezekiel says that they are not "living;" as when he says, "And I gave you statutes that are not good." It is with reference to those that he says, "Living. But thrust him from them, and in their hearts turned back to Egypt"-the place where they groaned, where they cried, whence they called upon God.
John Chrysostom · d. 407Homilies on Acts

Commentary

Matthew Henry · Verses 30–41

Men deceive themselves, if they think God cannot do what he sees to be good any where; he can bring his people into a wilderness, and there speak comfortably to them. He appeared to Moses in a flame of fire, yet the bush was not consumed; which represented the state of Israel in Egypt, where, though they were in the fire of affliction, yet they were not consumed. It may also be looked upon as a type of Christ's taking upon him the nature of man, and the union between the Divine and human nature. The death of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, cannot break the covenant relation between God and them. Our Saviour by this proves the future state, Mt 22:31. Abraham is dead, yet God is still his God, therefore Abraham is still alive. Now, this is that life and immortality which are brought to light by the gospel. Stephen here shows that Moses was an eminent type of Christ, as he was Israel's deliverer. God has compassion for the troubles of his church, and the groans of his persecuted people; and their deliverance takes rise from his pity. And that deliverance was typical of what Christ did, when, for us men, and for our salvation, he came down from heaven. This Jesus, whom they now refused, as their fathers did Moses, even this same has God advanced to be a Prince and Saviour. It does not at all take from the just honour of Moses to say, that he was but an instrument, and that he is infinitely outshone by Jesus. In asserting that Jesus should change the customs of the ceremonial law. Stephen was so far from blaspheming Moses, that really he honoured him, by showing how the prophecy of Moses was come to pass, which was so clear. God who gave them those customs by his servant Moses, might, no doubt, change the custom by his Son Jesus. But Israel thrust Moses from them, and would have returned to their bondage; so men in general will not obey Jesus, because they love this present evil world, and rejoice in their own works and devices.

Read Matthew Henry on Acts 7 →

Cross-references

14

People & places

Topics

Cross-references: Treasury of Scripture Knowledge. Hebrew and Greek data from STEPBible.org (Tyndale House, Cambridge), CC BY 4.0. Library: sources.